DIGITISER
  • MAIN PAGE
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Game Reviews
  • FAQ

IS THE Han Solo MOVIE IN CRISIS? SOD 'EM! - by Mr Biffo

21/6/2017

40 Comments

 
Picture
Here are two things I love: Star Wars and Disney.

For me, Disney buying LucasFilm was the best thing that could've happened to Star Wars at that point. There isn't a creative company on earth that works as hard at story, and protecting its properties, as Disney does.

You see it in their animated movies, in their Pixar films, in Marvel... even their theme parks; every ride, every land, in every Disney park, has a story. It might be subtle, but it's there. They really, really, really think about this stuff, and I love that there is at least one massive, corporate, entity on earth which - while still being run by fallible, vain, human beings like everything else - has that philosophy of storytelling and imagination at its core.

Yes, we can all scoff cynically at how much money is at stake, but there's an integrity there that you don't always see in big budget creative environments, where often everyone is really out for themselves.

Now you're seeing that Disney philosophy in Star Wars. to the point where, reportedly, director Gareth Edwards was removed late in the process of making Rogue One so that the higher-ups at Disney and Lucasfilm could micromanage the project into what they - collaboratively - felt it should be. 

Speaking as a writer who has been micromanaged by producers more than once, there's little that's more frustrating or creatively unfulfilling. Nonetheless, I begrudgingly admit that sometimes it makes for a better end project. Or, at least, one which might be more palatable and commercial, albeit at the expense of individual vision.

I don't think any of us really wanted to see another George Lucas Star Wars film, and yet, as time goes on, I've come to admire the Star Wars prequels more. 

Don't get me wrong: they're extremely bizarre, bad, movies, especially in light of what came before them. Nevertheless, part of me respects their purity - the way that they're exactly the films that George Lucas wanted to make. As artistic statements, they're very sincere. They're just not really summer blockbuster material. If he'd had someone else guiding the ship, they might've been better received.

Now, with the upcoming Han Solo movie, it seems that artistic vision has once again butted up against the Disney corporate brand-protecting, storytelling, machine.
Picture
LORDY LORD
Phil Lord and Chris Miller, who directed The Lego Move and 21 Jump Street, have parted ways with Disney, citing "creative differences" over the upcoming Han Solo movie. With production nearer to the end than the beginning, reports state that their more comedic tone was jarring with the vision of the movie's writer Lawrence Kasdan - who also, lest we forget, wrote The Empire Strikes Back and co-wrote The Force Awakens. 

Consequence: Lucasfilm boss Kathleen Kennedy is set to bring a new director on board to review Lord and Miller's work, and reboot the project more in line with Kasdan's script.

I was cautiously optimistic about Lord and Miller directing a Star Wars movie. Marvel has had a lot of success bringing seemingly left-field directors aboard its films (the Russo brothers who directed the last couple of Captain America movies, and are now helming Avengers: Infinity War, had worked on Community). 

But... while everyone is seemingly claiming that the sky is falling over the news that Lord and Miller have been removed from Han Solo (so to speak), I'm siding with LucasFilm here. There has belatedly been a bit of backlash over The Force Awakens for being too derivative of the original Star Wars, but I watched it again recently, and I still think they got it bang on. 

Likewise, Rogue One. I was disappointed in it after my first viewing - and I still think the two leads, Jyn and Cassian, are devoid of characterisation and likeable traits - but... man... that last act is just pure Star Wars.

If Lord and Miller are no longer on the project, because they were improvising too much around the script as written, then... y'know... sod 'em. Star Wars - as evidenced by the consensus on the Prequels - is a franchise that needs a steady hand on the tiller, and benefits more from being a collaborative project. It clearly isn't the place for experimentation.
Picture
DOWN DOWN DEEPER ON DOWN
Without knowing exactly what went down on the Han Solo movie.... here's the thing... I'm all for supporting the vision of any creative individual. However, there are times to flex creative muscles, and times that you have to rein them in.

As writers and directors, unless we're lucky to have had a massive hit or three, we're collaborators. We're hired to do a job to a brief, and if we don't do that job then we can expect to be let go. In no other line of work is there such preciousness. You don't employ a bloke to install your new washing machine, and then stand back to admire his integrity when he paints it neon green and sticks fronds all over the front, because he's "an artist". 

We all have an inherent - frankly juvenile - suspicion of "The Suits", that their motivations are selfish and put making money over individuals. However, I'm just as suspicious and disparaging of creative types, who put their cherished integrity above all else. If you're hired on a massive movie like Han Solo, you're hired to do a job, and do it well by leaning on your skills and experience - not indulge your own whims.

I mean, I've worked with Disney. From the point of view of a writer, they're often an absolute nightmare, but... man... they know what they want, and they're brilliant at conveying that. I've massive respect for that process. It's never in an attempt to disrespect the audience, just a way to strive for the best possible story. They understand and identify what the audience want to see, and what the audience needs. It's phenomenal, really. Good stories, good projects = successful projects.

Yes, it's risk-averse, but - again - you don't want someone installing your washing machine who's going to take "creative risks" with it.

I'm confident that whatever Lucasfilm/Disney saw in the Lord/Miller version of Han Solo wasn't what we would've wanted from a Han Solo film. It might've satisfied Lord and Miller, but - I suspect - would've let the rest of us down. Certainly, I know I don't want to see a version of Han Solo that's a comedy (which, suggest the rumours, is the direction the project was going in). That isn't who the character is for me. 

Also, speaking from experience, it's virtually unheard of that producers would back a writer's vision for a movie over the directors. That just never happens. From that alone, I'm backing Disney on this one.
Picture
WHAT DO YOU SAY?
I say this to any creative person: if you've got a creative itch which needs scratching, and you want to work on something that is entirely yours... do something that is entirely yours. Either get over yourself or don't hawk yourself out as a director or writer-for-hire.

Now, more than ever, there are ways of having creative control, without messing around in somebody else's sandbox. You might not have millions of dollars to play with, but - take it from a man whose house is full of cheap and cheerful props and scenery and costumes - that forces you to get more creative - not less. 

The director Neill Blomkamp had his Alien 5 feature axed in favour of the studio choosing to keep Ridley Scott sweet, by letting him make his bizarre Alien prequels. Consequently, he's set up Oats, his own mini studio, to make low-budget, experimental movies. Best of all, he's planning to make all of the assets from these projects available to everyone, to use in their own films or video games.

You can watch Rakka, his first short film from this endeavour, here.

To be honest, much as I'd like to see at least one more Alien film from somebody who understands what Alien and Aliens fans want from an Alien movie, I'd prefer someone like Blomkamp coming up with his own stuff, without the oversight of some sort of corporate committee telling him what is and isn't commercial.

Star Wars needs caretakers who understand and respect it, and ensure it's around for a long time to come. Firing directors during production is a bold and risky move - Disney and Lucasfilm must know that there'll now be a black cloud hanging over Han Solo until the day it's released.

It will be costing them a small fortune to let Lord and Miller go, bring on a new director, and mount reshoots, but that shows that - huge as Disney is - they care about Star Wars as much as its fans do.
FROM THE ARCHIVE:
HOW TO BE A WRITER (IF YOU'RE ME) - BY MR BIFFO
​
GAMES OF MY YEARS: DIGITISER - PART ONE BY MR BIFFO
40 Comments
Biscs
21/6/2017 10:16:53 am

I agree that it might be for the best that Lucasfilm adhere to their standards etc., but firing directors for not working the way you want, when they have worked that way on every other movie they have made, is a bit like yelling at the apples you bought for not being a nice sailboat

What does everyone think of the theory that JarJar was the original 'Phantom Menace'? I like it and think it holds a lot of weight. I don't know much about Star Wars though. Google it if you're bored at work, it's a good read

Reply
Jol
21/6/2017 02:50:59 pm

I hadn't heard the idea of JJB being some secret mastermind that is merely acting like a goofball to disguise his dastardly plans. Reading that it does sound like it'd probably have been better than what we ended up with (and this is from someone that loves Christopher Lee). This is, however, basically what Boris Johnson has been doing for his entire career.

Everyone seems to hate JJB, but he's really not all that bad (unless you buy into the whole racist thing). He was quite goofy and cartoony, like they just dumped a forgotten Looney Tunes character in there, but at least he wasn't infuriatingly dull. His stupid comic relief dialogue was delivered with more conviction than the po-faced shit being splattered about by the serious characters.

Reply
Harry Steele
21/6/2017 03:03:38 pm

It sounds like a delicious idea but then the reveal that the biggest buffoon was a secret mastermind seems really hacky

Reply
Biscuits
22/6/2017 07:51:06 am

Very Lucas to try and set up a beloved character that children adore, only to reveal he was the big bad all along, though. Something to rival Vader's paternal confession.

He got it wrong here: making JarJar intensely detestable

Bingo Rose
21/6/2017 04:53:31 pm

I absolutely adore that Reddit theory pertaining to Jar Jar being a baddy-me-do. It's difficult indeed to argue with a lot of it... not that I'd actively seek to debunk it anyway just because it's so damn enjoyable.

Something I don't think even appears in that Reddit theory is this YouTube video of Jar Jar literally mind-controlling characters into verbalising his words. It's magnificent stuff...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUOwsRv6MLc

(It's also worth looking up the origins of the name "Bink")

Reply
Paul
21/6/2017 10:32:28 am

All that talent being poured into what I refer to as "Am-Dram Star Trek" could surely be used to experiment and possibly make the next good thing? I'm kind of glad it was stamped on hard recently. Make something new!

I do worry that Disney will just crank out Star Wars films because it has an investment to recoup and that Star Wars will become lessened because of that.

Reply
Spiney O'Sullivan
21/6/2017 10:40:34 am

I'll be honest, I could not be less excited for this movie.

Am I being a terrible misery? Probably, but I miss when Marvel movies were an event worth waiting for rather than feeling like yet a twice-yearly obligation to keep up with a sprawling cinematic universe. I really don't want to see that happen to Star Wars too.

Reply
Matthew Long
22/6/2017 10:27:56 pm

I know what you mean; I've adored Star Wars since I was a kid, but the idea of there being a new Star Wars film released every year until I'm dead (and probably for another century after that) depresses the hell out of me.

Reply
Wil
21/6/2017 10:40:46 am

Who'd be Kathleen Kennedy, eh?
You've come up from being a secretary, through to being a producer with some of Hollywood's biggest-hitters and now you've ended up as the keeper of the Star Wars flame. At some point, the producer-y stuff has become mixed up with the artistic vision stuff so now you're, kind of, steering the gazillion-dollar franchise with both hats on but you don't actually direct or write the stories. I wouldn't want to do it.

Without knowing the ins and outs of it all I was a little surprised by the choice of Lord and Miller going on the sorts of films they've produced, anyway. Personally, I'd want someone who wasn't known for a strong style but then, being not particularly entertained by either TFA or Rogue One I think my passion for Star Wars has long since passed.

Reply
MENTALIST
21/6/2017 10:42:36 am

Since they starting the process of making Star Wars spin-off movies, it seems like Lucasfilm have gotten a bee in their bonnet about tonal consistency.

More than anything else, that's how The Force Awakens matches the original trilogy, and that was a factor in the supposed production shenanigans of Rogue One - making that a bit lighter. Seems like this one needs more gravitas in their eyes, and Lord and Miller aren't prepared to meet them in the middle.

They might be right. The fact that rumoured to be on the opposite side of the argument to the original directors is Lawrence Kasdan, who wrote both of Harrison Ford's most iconic characters is encouraging for the outcome, especially if, as rumoured, they appoint him as director.

Disney haven't had a complete disaster recently, despite any amount of production hell for their films. Well, I quite like Thor 2, anyway.

Reply
Mr Biffo
21/6/2017 10:47:59 am

I like Thor 2 as well.

Reply
Spiney O'Sullivan
21/6/2017 11:51:36 am

Aside from the scene with Thor on the tube, whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy?

David Heslop
21/6/2017 10:44:46 am

Really good points here, I agree with the broad thrust of it. It's always a shame when promising directors are removed from a project (or maybe leave through mutual consent, but whatever); I remember the furore when Edgar Wright left Ant-Man. That was even more of a shame, as he'd been nurturing the film since before the Marvel Cinematic Universe was really a thing (I think he may have been hired even before Jon Favreau on Iron Man). But for a huge ongoing meta-narrative like Star Wars or the MCU, there has to be a certain degree of consistency, and if Wright's take, or Ward & Miller's process, was producing something out of step with the rest of the universe, then obviously you can't proceed down that path or it'll just seem wrong. You can argue it's all money, or just fan service, but I agree that there's a commitment to story and tone and the development of something that's hugely popular for millions of people; Kevin Feige and Kathleen Kennedy have, I think, earned a degree of trust and respect from audiences at this point.

And, obviously, Star Wars ain't for everyone. Some people will think the version of Ant-Man we got sucked (I really, really liked it, and from what I understand, most of the things I liked about it were developments of replacement director Peyton Reed). As Mr B says, there'll be a cloud hanging over Han Solo for a year at least. But they're trying their best, it's a big shame when things don't work out, but not for a minute do I think it's just some wanky corporate power play or motivated solely by financial concerns.

One final point, which I concede might not be popular. I actually would have loved to see George Lucas finish his final Star Wars trilogy. Apparently he'd planned the three films, and tentatively had agreements from Fisher, Ford, and Hamill to return, before the sale to Disney. He gave them his notes and ideas, but they threw them away and made The Force Awakens instead. While TFA might be better than any film Lucas gave us (even if he assumed a producer role and gave scripting and directing duties to someone else), I think it would have been fascinating to see the original creator "finish" the story he started forty years ago (and continued to change and make up as he went along).

Reply
Reversible Sedgewick
21/6/2017 11:02:17 am

Ant-Man is great. It's the same director as the excellent cheerleading movie Bring It On, which is straight-up amazing. I defy anyone to watch Bring It On and be able to say for certain whether it's a parody film or not. It properly has its cake and eats it.

Reply
Reversible Sedgewick
21/6/2017 10:52:54 am

Maybe I shouldn't be so swayed by the words of critics (at which point, I guess I'd have to ask myself some questions about why I'm hanging around posting comments on a website spun out from a 20 year old games magazine, so maybe it's not so bad) but after reading this rather lovely article on Birth Movies Death, I can't view Rogue One through any other prism:

http://birthmoviesdeath.com/2016/12/21/rogue-one-film-crit-hulk-the-slippery-sloping-story-of-rogue-one

I know the received wisdom is that the third act was 'saved' by the reshoots and became some sort of pure-distilled Star Wars hit. But... it's broken. It's a heist movie where they forgot to do the "this is how it's supposed to go right!" scene. And you can't leave that out. You certainly can't replace it with Gin (Jyn) saying "there is no plan, we just have to take it as it comes!" or however that pre-splashdown speech went. It's just not good enough.

The linked article also gave me a better appreciation of the opening two acts, while kind of explaining to me why I came away feeling so unsatisfied. Despite watching the film in an entire IMAX theatre on my own, because I have insomnia and no friends, which was ace.

Reply
Random Reviewer
27/6/2017 07:43:49 pm

Film Crit Hulk is the best when it comes to explaining why stories fail to be functional:

"To dramatically care, the audience must be able to anticipate one result or the other. If I don't know what should happen, I can't fear what might happen. And it results in a "heist" with all these randomly shouted-out objectives in the middle of an unwieldy, unfocused battle that just wants to echo the last act of Return of the Jedi. Every action beat is desperate for clarity and works overtime to explain in the moment, but that's why it fails. Like, there's no tension in them getting through the shield because there's established reason it should work. It's just dumb luck, like almost everything that follows. It feels like they're literally fucking their way up through this, stabbing for needles in haystacks and finding them. This is seriously unforgivable for this movie. Because a heist is constructed around quiet build-up and the careful set-up of critical moments. There's a reason every heist film has a careful, visual "going over the plan" sequence and it's all about setting up dramatic expectations. There has to be a plan in order for things to go wrong. It's freaking everything in these kinds of movies."

Reply
David W
21/6/2017 11:01:45 am

Episode VIII: A New Washing Machine

Reply
Darcy
21/6/2017 11:10:47 am

Always found it amusing how the prequels aren't nearly as reviled as the Star Wars fandom would have you believe. I remember going to see TFA and overhearing some Yoofs complaining that it wasn't as good as TPM, which, of course, they had grown up with, much as their parents' generation had grown up with the original.

Reply
David Heslop
21/6/2017 11:22:54 am

Yeah, I have friends and relatives ten years younger than me who have no real problem with the prequels. I guess if you saw TPM when you were six then Jar Jar was pretty cool.

Reply
Darcy
21/6/2017 11:55:00 am

In much the same way that people who grew up with C3P0 don't see a whiny, robotic John Inman ruining every scene he's in.

Spiney O'Sullivan
21/6/2017 11:59:23 am

Also: Ewoks.

Cynical Jossen
21/6/2017 11:34:43 am

The originals stand up to the critical eye of adults and the prequels don't even slightly. Kids will like whatever is marketed at them

Reply
Matthew Long
22/6/2017 10:37:44 pm

I've encountered this too and find it totally baffling. I can look at the films and shows I once worshiped when I was a child and be able to judge them objectively. Some still stand up while others that I loved just as much back then are quite clearly terrible now that I'm an adult. Yet there is a generation who seem to think the prequels are great even though they are grown up and seemingly otherwise capable of rational thought. I've actually read some younger fans think that the normally excellent but in this instance miscast Ewan McGregor is more 'iconic' as Obi-Wan than the Oscar-nominated Alec Guinness, which hurts my soul.

Reply
RichardM
21/6/2017 11:24:22 am

I've watched Rogue One again recently, and really liked it yet again. I seem to be in a bit of a minority, but I didn't mind that the leads were a bit characterless - in fact, I sort of though those were the kind of people I'd like doing a stealthy sabotage mission - or that it was 'a story that didn't need to be told'. It was more Star Wars, and Star Wars of acceptable Star Warsiness for me to enjoy.

I'm a bit less interested in young Han Solo, to be honest, mostly because I like old Han Solo enough not to need to know any more about him. I'm more excited about new stories in the post-Return of the Jedi setting. Maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised.

Reply
Spiney O'Sullivan
21/6/2017 11:55:49 am

I liked Rogue One as well. It was basically The Dirty Dozen in space.

Reply
Jol
21/6/2017 02:23:24 pm

Rogue One is great, it manages to be Star Wars whilst also being very different to other films. You've got some good meaty stuff in there about civil war and terrorism, and the grittier tone is a nice change of pace for a series that descended to little more than dudes in robes bouncing around funky light shows.

After watching it I got quite excited at the idea of seeing different directors with their own unique vision taking on a Star Wars movie. One of the appeals of hiring directors with a track record in a certain style of film making is that you'll get much more interesting spin-off movies rather than just Star Was Sans Skywalker. Sure you can protect the core series, it makes perfect sense to do that, but why not branch out with the spin-offs? Go hire Wes Anderson or David Lynch or Tarantino and see what cool stuff they can come up with.

Waynan The Barbarian
21/6/2017 02:37:51 pm

The last 40 minutes of Rogue One is great. I found the rest of it to be boring with uninteresting, uncharismatic characters.

I heard it described as a sci-fi, war film, stick of rock with Star Wars running through the middle. Pretty accurate i thought.

It didn't feel like a Star Wars film for me.

It wasn't Attack of the Clones bad but it certainly wasn't as good as The Force Awakens never mind the originals.

Ste Pickford
21/6/2017 04:01:29 pm

I don't know if it's because I've been involved in creative industries, and worked on both projects where there's a creative vision, and on projects made to the dictates of marketing departments, but I just cannot work up any interest in even the best and slickest Disney movies.

I loved the first Star Wars movies as a kid. Obviously the next three were utterly rotten, and they cured my of any interest in Star Wars forever. As you say though, they've still got some artistic vision. The bad artistic vision of a bad artist (and probably surrounded by too many yes-men), but they do have their own character and personality.

I watched Force Awakens and it just felt utterly bland. I was bored watching it. Everything about it reeked of decision by committee and decision by focus group and executive dictate. Even now I find myself puzzled as to why anyone likes it. I've not bothered with the Rogue one - I'm 100% out with Star Wars.

You might be technically correct to say that Disney's is the right approach to Star Wars now, if milking something forever and making money off it forever are your goals. but I really don't see any point in Star Wars movies and spin offs. They're just blocking the channels and stopping something good AND interesting (like the original Star Wars) from getting a budget and finding an audience, and I think the world would be a better place with the an exciting new Star Wars equivalent by a new creator capturing the imagination of a generation, rather than the old Star Wars being shoved in the face of every new generation forever.

Reply
Col. Asdasd
21/6/2017 08:47:33 pm

I think you make a good point about there being opportunity costs in play here. Disney have to make a choice about who they want this film to appeal to. You can salute the desire to keep the appeal as broad as possible as the 'correct' decision but it's at the expense of a hundred more novel or interesting Star Wars movies getting made.

I hated the Force Awakens for that very reason: here we had an opportunity for all-new stories in the Star Wars universe, or even a continuation of the story after Return of the Jedi, but instead what we got was... the first three films, again. More or less beat for beat.

I'd already seen those films! Felt like a complete waste of time and money for everyone involved. I never felt like that about the prequels, as weird and unlovable as they are.

Reply
Cc
22/6/2017 11:28:18 am

Another vote for TFA being a rehashed, committee led blandfest.
I feel my star wars love ebbing with each Disney film.

Clockwork Fool
21/6/2017 04:03:03 pm

The Star-Wars prequels make a lot more sense when you realise that part of Lucas's thing is that he doesn't really like Star Wars that much and there's a degree to which they were a (possibly subconscious) attempt to deliberately sabotage the original trilogy.

The bits of it he hasn't already gone back and deliberately fucked around with directly, that is. You have to remember, Star Wars is a big, mainstream success and that wasn't what Lucas originally set out to achieve. I think a degree of resentment set in over the decades, that Star Wars was responsible for him never making it as a high concept art-house style director or what have you.

There are a few creative types who fall into the same type of mental trap. Sadly, Ridley Scott seems to be doing the same thing with his continuity-ignoring Alien Prequels.

Reply
Darren link
21/6/2017 04:32:59 pm

Blomkamp is a hack who struck lucky with his first film. The rest have been trash. He's like the Edgar Wright of sci-fi...

Reply
Spen Dorfwen
21/6/2017 04:55:59 pm

He joint-created and directed a hugely influential TV show for 2 series that established a manic, unique and instantly recognizable visual style, then followed it up with a critically acclaimed globally successful movie trilogy, before being invited to curate a film series at BFI?

Reply
MrDrinks
21/6/2017 08:55:35 pm

Darren, you have messed up bad.

Reply
Mr onions part2
21/6/2017 06:24:03 pm

If you recall my dear friend Keith Baron has recently filmed his small albeit important part in the young Han Solo movie, he did confess to me over a cheap red t'other night that the environment was fairly toxic while filming and Paul Greengrass' name was mentioned more than once.

Reply
Man of Seal
22/6/2017 06:54:15 am

Superman is my Star Wars (don't laugh) and it guts me just how bad they've messed up the characterisation this time.
Batman vs Superman should have been a licence to print money but ended up as a middling confusing 6/10 effort.
Kryptonite? Again? Rush the death of Superman just for Justice League?
But this is an example of the studio messing around in a bad way as the full cut of the movie makes a lot more sense.
I don't know what I'm talking about

Reply
PeskyFletch
22/6/2017 04:24:19 pm

6/10? You're right, you don't know what you're talking about.

Reply
I done a bad joke
22/6/2017 10:31:55 am

Did you just compare Star Wars to a laundry appliance? That was Bold.

Reply
John
22/6/2017 05:27:34 pm

Who would expect anything but a bold statement from the recently revealed Spice Girls biggest fan?

Reply
Chris Dyson
22/6/2017 10:27:54 pm

Aren't they using CGI to portray the young Han Solo? It worked so well for Tarkiin and Leia in Rogue 1.

Greg Turkington is in Ant Man making it the best super hero movie. 5 bags of popcorn with one of those little toy trains.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    This section will not be visible in live published website. Below are your current settings:


    Current Number Of Columns are = 2

    Expand Posts Area =

    Gap/Space Between Posts = 12px

    Blog Post Style = card

    Use of custom card colors instead of default colors = 1

    Blog Post Card Background Color = current color

    Blog Post Card Shadow Color = current color

    Blog Post Card Border Color = current color

    Publish the website and visit your blog page to see the results

    Picture
    Support Me on Ko-fi
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    RSS Feed Widget
    Picture

    Picture
    Tweets by @mrbiffo
    Picture
    Follow us on The Facebook

    Picture

    Archives

    December 2022
    May 2022
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    November 2020
    September 2020
    July 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014


    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • MAIN PAGE
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Game Reviews
  • FAQ