DIGITISER
  • MAIN PAGE
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Game Reviews
  • FAQ

HOW BIASED ARE GAMES JOURNALISTS? - by Mr Biffo

14/9/2016

12 Comments

 
Picture
The other day I got a message from a Digitiser2000 reader pointing me towards a Polygon article about Sony's PlayStation Pro strategy. Said piece was highly critical - though, admittedly, no more than other articles I've read - and I actually agreed with all of it.

However, the Digi reader suggested that it was further evidence of the website's bias against Sony. I don't read a lot of Polygon - if I'm honest, the layout of the site sort of confuses me - so I wasn't aware of any bias. And if I was, I wouldn't have really cared anyway.

Nevertheless, I did look into this accusation and discovered... well... I discovered accusations that Polygon was anti-Sony, pro-Nintendo, anti-Microsoft... and on and on. Surely, they can't be pro and anti every gaming format simultaneously? Can they?

It's a familiar story - back in the original Digitiser days, we would get letters accusing us of exactly the same thing. We ended up coining the phrase "We hate everyone equally", because we grew so weary of being accused by gamers of having a bias against their particularly console or computer. To which, obviously, they had their own bias.

​Frankly, I don't think we ever cared enough to actually have any sort of uncontrollable bias. A bias is quite a lot of work. It was, as stated, much easier to hate everyone equally.

There's a thick streak of format loyalty running through most gamers - I'm still a ZX Spectrum fanboy, even after all these years - and it's hard to see something you love being criticised. Especially when you've paid hundreds, or thousands, of pounds for it.

​So are games journalists biased? Maybe some of them. It's inevitable. But it might not be to the degree you suspect. And it isn't actually a bad thing. Wha... wha... whaaaaaa?!
BUNCH OF RACISTS
​See, here's the truth about everyone on earth: we're all prejudiced - every single one of us, without exception.

When I accidentally got stranded in Barbados years ago (no, really - it was so terrible...) I was taken aback by the open racism of assorted taxi drivers towards Guyanese immigrants ("Coming over here... taking all the jobs etc."). Because the drivers were black, I automatically assumed they couldn't be racist - which, in itself, was a form of prejudice. I'd judged them on the colour of their skin. 

When I later made the terrible error of spending several years training to become a psychotherapist, part of that training was to become aware of my own prejudices, and realise how we all have them.

Alas, they get wedged in there throughout our lives, and there's little any of us can do to get rid of them. However, shining a light on them at least makes it easier to control them, rather than letting them control us. No client wants to be sat opposite a therapist who might have a skewed view of them because they're Asian, or because of their religion, or because of how they dress, or how much they earn, or their tattoos, or whatever. 

ADMIT IT
It's a tough thing to do, admitting that you might have a prejudice against an individual, or group of people, that we might judge them without even knowing them - yet we all do it... Thing is though - is a bias even the same thing as a prejudice? I think when it comes to criticism of games journos, the line gets blurred.

Certainly, when I was a games journalist, I preferred some games companies over others. I mean, I'll get it out of the way now: Digitiser was never actually anti-Amiga. The reason why we never covered the machine in the first place was because we never had one to review games on.

We were a two-man team at the start, and it was enough work just getting all the other systems to review games on. We never covered the PC or Atari ST either at first... but it was only ever the Amiga fans who wrote in complaining. Suffice to say, this certainly skewed our coverage, and made it biased to a certain degree. Though mostly only to wind them up further.

​That in itself might've become a form of prejudice: tarring all Amiga owners with the same brush, because of the actions of a few. Well... a few thousand anyway.

From that point on, all of our Amiga coverage was sort of begrudging for the sake of a quiet life. We knew the format was on the way out, and once we were proven right we didn't hold back. Although that might not be bias. That's probably just smugness at being right. 
Picture
SPECIAL FAVOURITE
I think we probably treated the Super NES more favourably than the Mega Drive - yet we had more of a relationship with Sega than we did Nintendo.

Alright, it wasn't always a good relationship - at least one of Sega's PR guys was a scowl-faced barrow boy type who appeared to detest us (apart from the time we saw him at a trade show, after he'd moved on from Sega, and he was incredibly animated, and behaved as if we were his oldest friends - for some undefined reason...).

His replacement at Sega was a lovely man, who did his best to keep us happy, but by that point Mr Hairs and I were firmly into our 'naughty boy' phase, and we did everything in our power to wind him up. I confess that there was, quite possibly, some latent bias remaining from his predecessor, with regard to our Sega coverage.

Certainly, when the first PlayStation was released, we were treated pretty shittily by Sony. It improved once we'd publicly shamed the company's PR guy - and nearly lost our jobs in the process - but even then we were big enough to herald Sony's success once the machine started going nuts. We didn't like the PR guy who did his best to ignore us and get us fired, but we had nothing against the company or its machine.

I do know that there were one or two PRs, for smaller companies, whose games would perhaps get more coverage than they deserved, simply because they would pester us endlessly. Nice guys, admittedly, but sometimes it was the path of least resistance. 

DUNNO
Ultimately... I dunno about this whole bias thing. 

There often seems to be an assumption from readers that journalists are biased against one company or system over others, but it serves nobody well to have an irrational, uncontrollable, bias against or in favour of Sony or Microsoft or Nintendo. I struggle to think it ever realistically exists in multiformat coverage. 

From my experience, opinions were all too frequently mistaken for bias, and I think bias was too often mistaken for prejudice.

The latter can be defined as - to a certain degree - irrational, because it's an ingrained, premature judgement ("I'm going to hate Sony's new machine because it's Sony, and it'll be rubbish!"). You can be prejudiced against an individual, or group of individuals, without first-hand experience.

Bias tends to be built upon the evidence at hand, as you see it. It's more complex, less knee-jerk. That isn't to say that a bias can't be as skewed or distorted through how a person sees the world, but it's as much as anything down to a personal preference, and their opinion.

If you want a games journalist to put aside who they are, because you demand that their preference, or opinion, tallies with your own... then you might as well replace all games journalists with robots. Bias isn't always bad - it gives us shade and light, and allows us, the reader, to formulate their own opinions.

Ironically, there's a massive swathe of the gaming community which has an ingrained prejudice against games journalists - and they seemingly don't even realise it.
FROM THE ARCHIVE:
VINTAGE GAMING DURING AN AGE OF AUSTERITY
SEGA: A LESSON FROM HISTORY
SONY & APPLE: A TALE OF TWO PRESENTATIONS - BY MR BIFFO

12 Comments
Superbeast 37
14/9/2016 11:51:49 am

Ah Polygon...

There is a difference between holding an opinion on the strategy pursued by Sony, and giving a game (that I really enjoyed btw) 10/10 whilst being long time best buddies with the developer and not disclosing that fact or better still recusing yourself.

Both gamers *and* journalists don't seem to understand that.

Reply
Chris
14/9/2016 12:24:02 pm

I look forward to future articles written by 81-FF0. I welcome our new robot overlord.

Reply
Niall
14/9/2016 12:26:35 pm

I remember furious arguments over which was better out of N64 and PSX, and while I (the N64 owner) was perfectly happy to admit they both had their merits but mine was obviously better, my pal (the PSX owner) was not willing to rate the N64 as any better than a turd.

Mind you we were about 14 at the time so we had a good excuse.

Reply
Damon link
14/9/2016 09:59:42 pm

Gonna do this in list... listicle... (list and comment is... listmment? OK why not) listmment form.

1. Everyone who has authority on a subject has interacted with their subject matter and formed opinions on it which creates some kind of bias.

B. Every article, work, &c. is written with an intent or purpose. Sometimes this may come across as bias. Usually it will reflect thoughts and feelings of the writer towards their subject.

γ. I am a history major and since going back to school I have a course on Historiography which in the simplest description possible is the process of writing about history. The most important thing you learn is that just because something may have a bias or "agenda" it does not mean it is wrong or useless.

IV. In high school when they teach research they teach a very hard bias = bad and bias = DO NOT USE ALERT ALERT ABORT ARTICLE method. This is because for /scientific/ research that is very important but when interacting with the social sciences or literary and liberal arts-- democrafts have not been researched at this time-- if you try and discard everything with any sort of bias or agenda... you may find a single very dry encyclopedia entry... which in itself carries a bias about what is important enough to include...

Reply
Spiney O'Sullivan
14/9/2016 10:14:57 pm

Bias is frankly not something that is probably even possible for a critic to avoid. All they can really do is give the reader a chance to understand where they're coming from when it comes to reviews (i.e. if your mate made it, or if a big company is also paying your site to advertise it, then mention that). That said, by now readers should know to read between sources (actually a good thing to do with all news, not just games).

Reply
Dr Kank
14/9/2016 10:48:45 pm

I have to admit that whenever I see a games journalist I cross to the other side of the road

Reply
Kendall9000
14/9/2016 11:28:44 pm

Not being the prejudiced type, I tend to give game journos the benefit of the doubt and assume they're just a bunch of lazy incompetent clickbait merchants, rather than actually corrupt or particularly biased.

Reply
Random Reviewer
15/9/2016 03:12:40 am

I agree that we shouldn't expect individual reviewers to come without their own preconceptions, but I'd still expect them to give a new game a fair shake when reviewing it. However, as a gaming site, Polygon is a special case:

Around the time of late-stage GG Polygon came out and declared that they are a heavily left-leaning site and will explicitly look to publish articles that support their political views.

Having that bias out in the open is admirable.

What narks me off is when they disable comments (from the start) on certain articles to effectively curb arguments that run counter to their narrative. I believe this is harmful to the discourse and that the discourse > An editorial staffs personal beliefs. Present your own case by all means, but at least leave room for a healthy right of reply!

There are still good articles on Polygon and a bit of good writing, but I rarely visit the site directly these days and when I do chance upon an article I always take them with a pinch of salt and make sure I read another supporting source. I just never felt I could trust them to present certain subjects honestly. There is a parody site/twitter account called Porygon which amusingly sums up the exhaustion many people feel when it comes to the site.

I tend to go to Digi and Destructoid for my gaming news. I use Destructiod's C-blogs (forum-member articles) when I feel like reading thinkpieces. They tend to be a lot freer in expression than the staff writers and there is a real plurality of voices that you don't get on the main site.

Reply
FEoD link
15/9/2016 06:40:37 am

Because Biffo is Cockney, I automatically assumed he couldn't be racist against barrow boys, but I know see this was an unconscious bias of my own...

Reply
Gamerscribe link
16/9/2016 06:49:14 pm

I think a lot of Retro Gamers are still ridiculously biased. It's become very trendy to love Sega, especially the Dreamcast - which is a good machine, but the PS2 was no slouch and I'm sorry when MGS2 (first level) came out it smashed the hell out of any Dreamcast game that had been released by that point.

Reply
Spiney O'Sullivan
16/9/2016 09:51:21 pm

Funnily enough, despite being a massive Sega die-hard in the 90s, I've come to

Reply
Spiney O'Sullivan
16/9/2016 09:59:34 pm

... accept that they stuffed up a lot in the 90s.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    This section will not be visible in live published website. Below are your current settings:


    Current Number Of Columns are = 2

    Expand Posts Area =

    Gap/Space Between Posts = 12px

    Blog Post Style = card

    Use of custom card colors instead of default colors = 1

    Blog Post Card Background Color = current color

    Blog Post Card Shadow Color = current color

    Blog Post Card Border Color = current color

    Publish the website and visit your blog page to see the results

    Picture
    Support Me on Ko-fi
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    RSS Feed Widget
    Picture

    Picture
    Tweets by @mrbiffo
    Picture
    Follow us on The Facebook

    Picture

    Archives

    December 2022
    May 2022
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    November 2020
    September 2020
    July 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014


    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • MAIN PAGE
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Game Reviews
  • FAQ