DIGITISER
  • MAIN PAGE
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Game Reviews
  • FAQ

BOYCOTT STAR WARS VII: A NON-MOVEMENT by Mr Biffo

20/10/2015

45 Comments

 
Picture
Some of you may have been aware that - for a brief period yesterday - the hashtag #BoycottStarWarsVII was trending on Twitter.

Those of you who subsequently dared to investigate further would've doubtless been assaulted with thousands of tweets decrying the actions of an apparent racist movement.

They were, supposedly, advocating boycotting The Force Awakens, due to "White-hating" JJ Abrams decision to cast John Boyega - a black British male actor - and Daisy Ridley - a white British female actor - as the movie's leads. Either that, or you would've found dozens of links to websites reporting on the story.

Apparently, this was cited as evidence of "Cultural Marxism" and "White Genocide", and other inflammatory buzz terms... the like of which are basically red rags to the bulls of the impassioned and just.

So gripped was social media with the hashtag that Abrams himself even introduced the new trailer for The Force Awakens with a tweet stating "I don't care if you're black, white, brown, Jawa, Wookiee, Jedi or Sith. I just hope you like it!".

However, actually finding the racist tweets which led to the Twitterstorm was somewhat more difficult, buried as they were beneath Mount Furore. What the hell happened?

TRACING
Tracing #BoycottStarWarsVII back to its origins, it seemed to be the work of a handful of users who were looking to be controversial, using the usual right-wing, racist rhetoric, purely to stir up attention.

Disgusting behaviour to be sure - and anyone who uses racist language even as a "joke" is still a racist, let's not pretend otherwise - but this seemed to be deliberately provocative. It wasn't The Queen posting those tweets, or Vladamir Putin - it was some utter dickflaps on the Internet. 


Reading that initial flurry of tweets, there's no mistaking that the people responsible are fairly horrible human beings, but in this instance I don't think they were any sort of genuine cause, or were sincerely advocating boycotting the movie (Lando Calrissian was black, Darth Vader's voice was black, Mace Windu was black...). Let's face it: they're still going to see it, even if they do make racist jokes throughout.

The point at which #BoycottStarWarsVII flared up, and became a bona-fide trending topic, was when The Mary Sue - the self-styled femist pop culture "nexus" that has been the target of much GamerGater ire over the past year - reported on the story.

What frustrates most profoundly, is that #BoycottStarWarsVII would've just faded away had The Mary Sue decided to take the only course of action it deserved: ignore it. Once they ran the story it got picked up by everyone with an axe to grind when it comes to entitled, white, racist pricks - and suddenly those who started the hashtag got exactly what they wanted: attention.
Picture
IRONY
I appreciate the irony of me reporting on the story, and merely adding to the pile of digital dust motes.

But unlike many other websites - and national newspapers, for pity's sake -  I'm not going to miss the obvious truth of what happened. Just to take two examples, The Hollywood Reporter called #BoycottStarWarsVII a "movement", while our own The Mirror said the hashtag had "backfired", because so many had come out in opposition to it.


I mean, it's great that so many people aren't racists and all that, but #BoycottStarWarsVII was no more a movement than half a dozen vocal, racist pricks in a pub nook. Likewise, the hashtag didn't backfire - it threw those racist pricks into the spotlight. It was exactly what they wanted. It's what they set out to do - and the victory was handed to them on a plate, because nobody was able to take a deep breath before responding.

HASHTAG TO FORTUNE
So, well done everyone who contributed to making #BoycottStarWarsVII a trending topic - you poured a can of petrol on a burning match that would've burnt itself out in seconds. It gave the hashtag a weight, and an importance, that it otherwise wouldn't have had. You recruited even more into their "cause" - many of whom hadn't just set out with the intention of trolling in as offensive a way as possible. 

It's lunacy, and I grow weary of certain groups that identify with an 'ism', who seem to do this over and over again, without ever learning. It's perpetuating fights that would otherwise go away. It holds us back, clouds proper communication, and it makes me despair of social media.

We're not going to stamp out racism, or sexism, or 
transism, or any other ideological prejudice simply by shouting at idiots online. There's no empathy with online interaction, and their brand of jaundice is too engrained, too much a cast-iron frame of reference. You form a vocal, angry movement against them and you make them stronger - you make that ideology harder to break. They link arms, stand firm, and you give them something to fight back against.

I'm not saying it's not a dialogue that shouldn't be had - change doesn't come about if nobody says anything - but Star Wars The Force Awakens has cast a black lead and a strong female lead. That probably wouldn't have happened 40 years ago. It's progress.

​Let's celebrate it, and ignore anyone who feels sufficiently threatened by the world to post 140 characters online about it.

FROM THE ARCHIVE:
VG TIPS: GAMES JOURNALISTS ARE IDIOTS TOO by Mr Biffo
WHY THE BBC NEEDS GAMERS IF IT WANTS TO SURVIVE by Mr Biffo
45 Comments
Nick the Gent link
20/10/2015 01:42:24 pm

Well said, Brother Biffo.

Reply
Mr Biffo
20/10/2015 01:51:47 pm

Cheers, Brother Nicholas.

Reply
Fox Mouldy
20/10/2015 02:01:24 pm

So true. As I always say - social media is an enormous vat of raw sewage the whole world seems intent on splashing about in. It's a wind tunnel which magnifies everything beyond all reason and sanity.

In fact I wasn't aware of any of this until I read this piece (I generally avoid the papers and online news websites, with only the Russia Today TV channel to let me know if the world has ended or not).

<sigh> I do miss the days of TV Digi. One of the worst things in modern time is that, whereas before everyone was free to say and think what they like, now everyone also has a platform with which to reach 7 billion. Previously this kind of reach was limited to gatekeepers such as trained journalists, elected government, or Mr Biffo. Now literally anyone can hijack the minds of the masses, through clever social media use, and so manipulate them into stupidity.

You see it with these stupid memes which invent complete bullshit "facts", or re-appropriate an image out of context, changing the actual meaning, and thousands will go mad over it. Today every damned internet user is a potential propaganda machine. One of the saddest I saw in recent weeks was someone taking an old photo from the war in the Middle East, putting a caption under it saying "Look what some country just did", and social media and websites went crazy over it.

It was days later when someone pointed out, actually, this photo is completely unrelated to recent events, you can find the original from several months back here, and basically everyone had a goddamned kanipshin over literally nothing. I mean, genuinely, someone just made up a caption and attached it to an unrelated photo and people shat metaphorical bricks through their tearducts.

Sorry. I'm ranting. But I'm just fed up with everyone being stupid and mean spirited asshats.

I no longer advocate freedom of expression, because most people have shown themselves to be too stupid to wield it.

Reply
Harry Steele
20/10/2015 02:17:06 pm

I wish I could LIKE this like on facebook but this will have to do

Reply
Nick the Gent link
20/10/2015 08:15:20 pm

"You see it with these stupid memes which invent complete bullshit "facts", or re-appropriate an image out of context, changing the actual meaning, and thousands will go mad over it. Today every damned internet user is a potential propaganda machine. One of the saddest I saw in recent weeks was someone taking an old photo from the war in the Middle East, putting a caption under it saying "Look what some country just did", and social media and websites went crazy over it."

You are spot on. We have a whole generation of people now who communicate in meme. Meme is a language.

It's as you say - rip an image out of context, bundle it together with some other quote out of context, and suddenly you're a political or cultural commentator.

People reply to articles with "This." This what? This is good? "I can't even". What?

I'm just glad that the Digi community exists on the internet.

Reply
René Descartes
20/10/2015 08:43:26 pm

This

Steve McOffended
20/10/2015 09:29:15 pm

I literally can't even

Harry Steele
20/10/2015 02:11:50 pm

Hear, hear! Don't get me started on The Mary Sue, either. I used to visit all the time as it was a refreshing alternative view on male-dominated pop-culture but now the writers seem to spend a lot of their time looking for things to be offended by, it seems to me. It became quite exhausting wading through the ire and outrage that was posted day in day out, where just causes got muddled in with molehills that had become mountains.

Don't they know not to feed the trolls? Their reaction to this hashtag seems like they don't.

Reply
Klone
20/10/2015 03:03:24 pm

Yep. I used to quite enjoy reading it at a time but they got more and more angry with everything, seemingly. They'd go completely over the top with every single thing they post. They misinterpreted a tweet by someone once, forget who, and blew it up into this massive thing that it really wasn't.

Reply
Superbeast 37
20/10/2015 05:42:43 pm

I bet those criticising Star Wars are just false flag sock puppets or a handful of dumb 14 year old kids doing it for lols.

Next thing you know someone like Brooker is writing a column smearing millions of totally innocent people who don't have a clue what is going on and are just stood there going "huh, what just happened, why does everyone hate us?"

You never find out who these anonymous egg accounts are owned by but you always see the same people and the same publications quick to blame millions for what could be the work of one or two unemployed sickos or a few corrupt media sites wanting to stoke up outrage for click bait.

It's always something big with a lot of money behind it. Star Wars stories will pull in a lot of clicks especially if it involves controversy. Who stands to gain? Hmmm

In 40 years I've met a lot of people and didn't meet anyone that held bigoted views. I'm from a generation that hero worshipped Mr T, pretended to be him in the playground and to this day wear tshirts with him on.

If my 80's crew had no issue then I doubt millennials do. Especially among nerds who tend to be victims, not perpetrators.

Yet I'm expected to believe that there is an issue with nerdy fan bases not wanting black leads? A mass cultural problem in these interests?

Absolute rubbish. Total garbage.

Not buying the "social justice"/press narrative in afraid. I smell BS or a setup.

Shame on anyone who tries to make this out as any thing more than a handful of people who are totally insignificant and don't represent anyone or are businesses doing it for a fast buck.

Of course it will be the usual story. A handful of unknown agents say something bad. The media smear millions of innocents. The innocents come out swinging to defend themselves from the smear and then the media strawman that and claim that the innocents trying to defend themselves are actually defending the obnoxious comments (that they never actually made).

Reply
Klone
22/10/2015 07:52:34 pm

4Chan. *sighes

Reply
Steve McOffended
20/10/2015 07:35:30 pm

This a very long way of saying "stirring up a controversy gets more clicks". Which isn't wrong. Getting people mad does get attention, and creating an "us vs them" dynamic (even if "them" is about three morons) helps make readers feel good about themselves (more clicks!). Welcome to modern Internet.

Not sure about "false flags", though. Dumb and awful people do exist. Just that here they're mercifully a minority, and could easily have been ignored.

Reply
Steve McOffended
20/10/2015 07:44:13 pm

This was meant to be a reply to the comment directly above, not the article...

Reply
Superbeast 37
20/10/2015 08:50:04 pm

The false flags I was thinking of would likely be tweets trying to start a hashtag (with a whiff of racism about it) that were likely from sock puppet accounts that a media site set up.

They would try to start the hashtag by masquerading as nerds from some fandom or other, blame the innocent subculture for its creation and then profit from all the drama.

Naturally they would support the "righteous" side and of course their enemies that they brand as a "hate mob" would actually be the innocent fandom saying "we didn't have nothing to do with it"...........to which said website would twist those words and say "oh look they are defending those racist tweets".

In steps The Guardian running a one-sided assault on the fandom, inciting harassment against all the innocent fans, and the moderators deleting any comments protesting their innocence and accusing the media of smears.

Remember the media have form for all sorts of nasty behaviour.

Such as the old incident with Gawker ruining a very positive campaign that Coca Cola were running by feeding Mein Kampf into it.

"Don't worry, it is only the ravings of a psychopath that ultimately lead to the deaths of 60 million people. Who cares about the victims. If it brings in those clicks and ad dollars its all cool".

Absolutely shameful. Do you think it would be beyond such people to orchestrate this entire Star Wars thing to boost their flagging fortunes? They need money for their lawsuits after all. I think they absolutely 100% would do that without batting an eyelid.

That is what is so staggering. Five years ago you would be suggesting that I put on a tin foil hat and check myself into an asylum. Yet in 2015 people would shrug their shoulders and say "doesn't surprise me".

Steve McOffended
20/10/2015 09:26:31 pm

I wouldn't put much past Gawker, admittedly. But actively manufacturing outrage when it's frankly so easy to find things to get outraged about on the internet seems like a waste of their time.

If it hadn't been this tweet, they'd have dug the same story up from someone posting the same idea on a forum or other.

Bugler
20/10/2015 09:09:27 pm

As time passes, Twitter becomes more like an abyss that people willingly chose to stare into. Every time I see a "real journalist" place any stock in such nonsense, I despair at the general state of the media. So, it's with no small degree of relief that I read an article like this followed by comments like those. Digi is the only brand of internet-based stupidity I need in my life.

Reply
ChorltonWheelie
20/10/2015 09:45:36 pm

Ha Ha! Listen to the old people.

Reply
Yeah
20/10/2015 10:05:02 pm

So, the other side of the coin is that yeah, nobody will give a shit about this is about... what... four hours? Excellent, so this victory that these arseholes have had amounts to nothing right? Right. Internet fame is both short-lived and has no monetary value.

Reply
THE MARY SUE HERSELF, LITERALLY. ALSO JEZEBEL OR WHATEVER.
20/10/2015 11:15:59 pm

Feeling ambivalent to this article. Like, really? Being highlighted as heinous means they are victorious now? With such a self-defeating definition of "victory", I seriously wonder if they could've lost in the first place.
Maybe next time I fall off my bike and break my leg, I'm going to buy myself a trophy with the legend "champion of the people".

Reply
Steve McOffended
20/10/2015 11:38:44 pm

You'd be surprised. Seems like every election, we have one party that is a niche set of fringe nutters, then the media hypes them up as if they're really a threat, everyone gets upset and self-righteous, they actually gain support from people who do think like them but have been quiet about it, then the election happens and the numbers show they weren't even remotely a threat in the first place.

End result is that what would have happened anyway happens, but the fringe types have a bigger profile, and a few new supporters/funders they didn't have before the press tried to convince everyone they actually mattered.

Reply
SPYING ON MR BIFFO SO I CAN REPOST HIS SHIT ON GAWKER
21/10/2015 01:19:55 am

I dunno, I don't think "a group of angry white nerds"(Jessica Lachenal dixit) is synonymous with "really a threat". I fail to see any overreacting form their side.

Let's put things in perspective here. The Mary Sue is a niche blog, not CNN, I don't think they are quite evenly matched in audience. Since I'm not an avid reader of The Mary Sue, I may fuck up here, but I'm willing to bet this is not the first time they have singled out a small(-ish?) twitter hashtag, shitty blog or 4chan trend, and since I don't see Mr Biffo complaining each and every time this happens, then really, the only reason you guys are finding out The Mary Sue wrote about #BoycottStarWarsVIII is because it's fucking Star Wars and not because The Mary Sue wrote a thing.

I'm just not comfortable with the idea that we shouldn't write about anything ever, lest someone who wanted attention gets it. I don't think the next Star Wars movie would have featured a black dude and a woman on stellar roles if people weren't talking about black and female representation and that probably involves a bunch of people talking about -isms. Some of that talk may have even been online.

Steve McOffended
21/10/2015 01:08:19 pm

The Mary Sue might be niche, but I imagine The Guardian (who have also written about this "issue" twice now) has at least a couple more readers...

J.Whedon
22/10/2015 07:57:40 pm

You should read their 'articles' about my tweets if you think they only say stupid things about niche characters. Honestly. I make Storm say stupid stuff and nobody bats an eyelid. I say a handful of words about a Jurassic World and everyone loses their minds.

Darth Brooks
20/10/2015 11:17:47 pm

I bet the Emperor used Twitter, but he probably used the force to type swear words into the computer instead of his twisted old fingers

Reply
Col. Asdasd
20/10/2015 11:22:31 pm

Some of these comments certainly seemed right 'out there' in terms of outright paranoia, but then I load up this Mary Sue to see what all the fuss is about and one of the top stories details the formation of a #CelebrateStarWarsVII campaign. So in order to help the fight against racism (which is obviously awful and something sane people would want to do), people are being encouraged to... spread positivity about the launch of a multi billion dollar mega-franchise blockbuster? That does seems a bit, I dunno, convenient doesn't it? 'Cui bono' and all that?

Reply
Steve McOffended
21/10/2015 04:01:30 pm

I doubt it's an intentional marketing ploy, it just so happens that a lot of "geek culture" is about fetishising consumerism.

Reply
Granthon P
20/10/2015 11:47:19 pm

This entire story -- if that's not too strong a word? -- had entirely passed me by until I read this. The specifics are unimportant, but the pattern is readily identifiable, and is part of a really rather worrying trend.

Skipping over that for now, we should try to take more notice of the obvious fact that we -- people, that is -- don't do "online" very well. The Internet is absolutely hopeless when it comes to having constructive group discussions, because the "constructive group discussion" problem is demanding, difficult and unprofitable.

Various sites take different measures, but when you are dealing with user counts in the many millions, the noise overwhelms the signal, and the signals that propagate the best are the ones which are most noisy. Quiet, informed, reasonable debate is quite impossible in such an environment -- and this is a problem which so far lacks a solution.

(Or, perhaps there isn't a problem here at all, and I am just an outmoded old fart: also possible.)

The trend I mentioned above? That trollishly inflammatory racism, sexism, transism and whatever-ism, through its constant repetition and exposure, gains superficial legitimacy. Just look at the many so-called "men's rights activism" movements, which are nothing but legitimized troll operations.

It's a brave new world, people. Let's try and be more conscious of what it means to live in it.

Reply
Keith
21/10/2015 08:01:16 am

It's something that has changed even in the last two years or so; when message boards were more prominent, it sometimes was useful to argue a point so that perceived sexism/ racism/ homophobia didn't go unchallenged. And any trolling or organised spamming could be dealt with by moderators, and it sometimes meant that a well reasoned point won out against abusive/unjustifiable behaviour.

With social media though, the aim of (any, positive or negative) group isn't to win an argument, it's to gain attention, and arguments are indeed the best way of doing that; look at Britain First: they must love it when the people they've tricked into sharing poppies get called racist, because it plays into their hands. And if you were to calmly and reasonably dismantle one of their posts, they'd simply delete your contribution. They control it.
And look at the reaction on the comments section here when GamerGate was jokingly referenced; those weren't (on the whole)regular readers, it was a mobilisation, and it wasn't about constructively clearing something up.
So the only way it's worth arguing this sort of this is when it's someone you know, and with whom you can have a friendly chat about it - it's no good point scoring, I guess. At a push, it's also sometimes worth posting a message or two in support if someone well meaning is being trolled(in the now accepted meaning)/bullied, but often sending them a PM expressing support is better, as it's less grandstandy.

I used to find myself getting drawn into arguments a lot, but I managed to completely avoid gamergate, and I think it's something anyone who has a tendency to get into online arguments should do - make a choice to sit out one shitstorm - and then afterwards think "would my contributions have made any difference whatsoever?" And the answer is probably "No"

Reply
Superbeast 37
21/10/2015 09:10:52 am

When you and your hobby are being smeared and libelled by the mainstream media for crimes you didn't commit but are serious enough to damage your employment prospects just for being associated with that hobby, it is very difficult to just sit back and let people in positions of influence kick you in the teeth and drag your name and those of your friends through the mud.

Yes granted given that your defence will likely be censored or strawmanned into being a defence of the crime then yeah it is true that responding may not change a darn thing.

Still if you do nothing that will also be seen as an admission of guilt.

"look, they aren't even denying it" is how keeping out of it would be spun.

At least by fighting, some neutrals and some with ethics would look to see what is really happening.

Good job my generation didn't just sit back and keep out of it when Jack Thompson and Co were attacking us.

Reply
PeskyFletch
21/10/2015 01:36:26 pm

Weren't all the gamergate comments mostly one or two readers just changing their posting name to further wind up that Simon kid?

Reply
Simon
21/10/2015 03:04:24 pm

We were winding each other up.

And some good points made here. Part of the problem with the internet in general is the fact you can post anonymously. Most people online post stuff that they wouldn't say to someone's face eg would the people responsible for the "movement" mentioned in this piece go to somewhere like Peckham and say this? Of course not

Obviously it is impossible but the only way to clear up all types of social media/comments sections is some sort of ID system. I have been a member of various football forums where you had to pay to be on there and everyone went through a phase of putting their pictures on their sigs and overnight the trolling stopped as people were suddenly worried they might meet some of the people they were having a go at, some of whom were pretty big blokes!

Never been a fan of social media and that is why I never use any of it

Timmypoos
21/10/2015 09:14:28 am

Starwars is a film.

Reply
Dirk Funk
21/10/2015 10:12:05 am

Before we make any decisions, let's wait and see what Simon has to say on the matter.

Reply
Simon
21/10/2015 02:35:49 pm

First time on here for a month and I am still being referenced - brilliant!

And tickets to see the film in December - can't wait

Reply
Stoo
21/10/2015 10:31:04 am

Sites like the Mary Sue can be ragey and a bit tiring but, I dunno, it's easy to dismiss outrage when white, straight, male etc. I don't know if they've accomplished anything useful but I'd rather live in a culture of over-sensitivity to racism to one where it's tolerated.

Reply
Mr Biffo
21/10/2015 11:03:35 am

Well, yeah... I agree with that to a point. At the same time you could argue that the outraged are often the worst-placed to comment on the most helpful course of action, given that they're the ones having their buttons pushed. It's hard to keep a level head, and display restraint, when you feel you're the aggrieved or persecuted party.

Reply
Stoo
21/10/2015 11:45:17 am

okay hang on. I appreciate the need for some rational thinking, but this sounds patronising. Is it really my place to tell a feminist how to react because I'm all aloof and unaffected by sexism?

Mr Biffo
21/10/2015 01:08:44 pm

Stoo - wasn't intended to be patronising. I was playing at being Devil's Advocate. I wouldn't for a second want to tell anyone how to react about anything. I'm just saying... there's a reason why there are third-party mediators, peace diplomats, marriage counsellors and the like. Sometimes people need to step out of a situation in order to see the way forwards without being blinded by hurt or rage.

Reply
Stoo
21/10/2015 01:34:55 pm

Fair enough. :) I guess I'd just rather hear the "ok everyone calm down" message come from other people within the affected group.

Reply
Mr Biffo
21/10/2015 01:38:32 pm

Yeah, me too...!

unitled
21/10/2015 03:09:31 pm

While I get this article to an extent, the Mary Sue article seemed very much of the tone '...and then there's THIS arsehole'. I read it, laughed at the arseholes, and moved on, as I imagine the vast majority of the readers did.

The arseholes have claimed people got really angry and upset about it, therefore THEY WIN, when really the response of just about everybody was 'haha, idiots.' Do you know anyone who has actually got wound up and upset about this? Anyone who has said anything except for 'what a bunch of stupid racists, oh well, makes it easier for me to get a ticket'?

There was a similar 'trolling' op recently where they started a hashtag along the lines of #pissingforequality and tweeted loads of pictures of women weeing from fetish sites and claimed they were getting feminists to wet themselves. Slaps on the backs all round, aren't those feminists gullible. Turned out every single one of the tweets was from a fake twitter account, and the response from everyone, everywhere was to ignore them.

Reply
Mr Biffo
21/10/2015 05:26:37 pm

Well... I don't know anyone personally. But it was the number one trending topic on Twitter for a while, which was mostly the result of people decrying the racist idiots. And then pretty much every major news source reported the story as a "campaign" to see Star Wars boycotted. Which it wasn't: it was a handful of idiots, and a ton of online outrage. Which drew attention to something that otherwise would've been ignored. Which is also just me paraphrasing my article, so I'm not going to make my point any better in a single paragraph, if I haven't already done so...!

Reply
Mr Biffo
21/10/2015 05:29:02 pm

PS. While I get the "outrage" - or the response of people individually - it was more the way the story was reported which wound me up. Unfortunately, I do disagree with you that The Mary Sue was just a sort of eye-rolling: I think it distorted the issue and magnified it. And then even the sodding Guardian was reporting on it!

unitled
22/10/2015 10:09:14 am

Yeah... I can see this point of view, totally. And I think one of the more pernicious aspects of widespread reporting (even the Graun, ffs) of this is that it kind-of immunises you to everyday racism. When you've got some massive overblown idiot in a white pointy hat saying THIS SCIENCE FICTION FILM STARRING A BLACK MAN IS CLEARLY ABOUT THE DESTRUCTION OF THE WHITE RACE it's easy to point to them as the only type of racists.

It's not these attitudes that are causing trouble in society, it's the thousands of little things that add up to a harder life if you're not white. But actual racists can point to this and say 'well, I'm not like that, and the reaction proves racism is over, but seriously it's just common sense that these Syrians are faking it and no-one should come into my country'

Hmm.

(I still like the Mary Sue, though...)

Steve McOffended
21/10/2015 06:00:27 pm

Unfortunately it's good for The Mary Sue's hits to make hate-mountains out of minor idiocy-molehills. Getting people's hackles up is bound to get clicks. Some would say it baits clicks, even.

In fact, just consider how many more comments are on this article compared to others, I suggest Biffo gives this site a strategic refocusing: Sensitiser2000 - Enrage-me-do!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    This section will not be visible in live published website. Below are your current settings:


    Current Number Of Columns are = 2

    Expand Posts Area =

    Gap/Space Between Posts = 12px

    Blog Post Style = card

    Use of custom card colors instead of default colors = 1

    Blog Post Card Background Color = current color

    Blog Post Card Shadow Color = current color

    Blog Post Card Border Color = current color

    Publish the website and visit your blog page to see the results

    Picture
    Support Me on Ko-fi
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    RSS Feed Widget
    Picture

    Picture
    Tweets by @mrbiffo
    Picture
    Follow us on The Facebook

    Picture

    Archives

    December 2022
    May 2022
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    November 2020
    September 2020
    July 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014


    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • MAIN PAGE
  • Features
  • Videos
  • Game Reviews
  • FAQ